Gamecommunity =GCHQ= http://forum.gamecommunity.co.uk:8080/ | |
MacbookAIR http://forum.gamecommunity.co.uk:8080/viewtopic.php?f=122&t=48882 |
Page 1 of 1 |
Author: | Skrunk =GCHQ= [ Tue Jan 15, 2008 7:42 pm ] |
Post subject: | MacbookAIR |
The MacbookAIR New Apple laptop, 0.16 inches thin at its thinnest point, 0.76 inches at its thickest Core 2 Duo, 5 hour battery life, backlit screen and key board, multi touch track pad crazy ish man, crazy ish |
Author: | Chips=GCHQ= [ Tue Jan 15, 2008 8:53 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: MacbookAIR |
How much though? Read some specs, am fairly sure that whilst it's "thin" at one end (the rest of the stats looked pretty bog standard or low for the price tag) there isn't much new about it, other than some "greenish" credentials. However, it could be lacking from research from myself - revising, so can't spend an hour reading around |
Author: | Skrunk =GCHQ= [ Tue Jan 15, 2008 8:55 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: MacbookAIR |
yeah pretty lame stats tbf $1799 1.6ghz cpu (optional $300 upgrade to 1. |
Author: | Tjolbi=GCHQ= [ Tue Jan 15, 2008 8:59 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: MacbookAIR |
that's quite incredible very nice (i'm still sticking to my 0.87 to 1.33 inches though) edit: of course it's overprized and badly spec'd, what did you expect? |
Author: | Chips=GCHQ= [ Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:12 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: MacbookAIR |
It's price tag is competitive from memory to other 13in, although with lower specs. I just don't see the market they pitch at. Their existing macbooks are the same size as this, except this is a bit thinner... however, it's a worse spec I think. It's still the same depth/width as far as I could tell, so it's only on the height of it that they've trimmed a bit off, with about 1-1.5cm in height as far as I can tell. No optical drive though, that's got to help with the height Basically, I don't see the point It's not height that is a problem personally for laptops, they're all about 2.5-3.5cm's tall (this will be about 2cm at the tallest part) - it is the other dimensions, so I can't see why this'll be such a selling point. Naturally it'll do well due to the "Apple" branding and sales though, and they appear to attract a good "must buy new shiny" following. |
Author: | Holy Monkey [ Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:23 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: MacbookAIR |
I'm waiting for the next EeePC |
Author: | _Tomassevich_ [ Wed Jan 16, 2008 2:24 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: MacbookAIR |
people with money to blow and a sore back maybe? |
Author: | Tao [ Wed Jan 16, 2008 1:11 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: MacbookAIR |
TBH I'd be more tempted by one of the little Sony VIAO's if I had that cash to spend on a ultra portable, coupla hundred grams more weight, optical drive, better graphics, roughly the same size, and replaceable battery, just better specced for about the same price, and just as nice looking. hxttp://vaio.sony.co.uk/view/ShowProduc ... +SZ+Series hxttp://www.reghardware.co.uk/2008/01/16/eee_vs_air/ |
Author: | LeBeourfCurtaine [ Sun Jan 20, 2008 2:18 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: MacbookAIR |
The MacBuchAir isn't THAT advanced, in fact it hardly has anything over the portable computers of yesteryear: |
Author: | Sleeper Service=GCHQ= [ Mon Jan 21, 2008 2:18 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: MacbookAIR |
lol commodore ftw |
Author: | gemma=GCHQ= [ Mon Jan 21, 2008 2:42 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: MacbookAIR |
Nice table Beefy. Informative. |
Author: | EkO=GCHQ= [ Sat Feb 02, 2008 9:20 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: MacbookAIR |
Looks like it would make a good mousemat |
Author: | gemma=GCHQ= [ Sat Feb 02, 2008 9:27 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: MacbookAIR |
EkO=GCHQ= wrote: Looks like it would make a good mousemat A bit too curved imho. |
Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |