| Author |
Message |
|
nicey=GCHQ=
|
Post subject: Re: battlefield 3 news...  Posted: Thu Feb 10, 2011 4:01 pm |
|
 |
| it is I! Diabetes man! |
 |
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2004 1:15 pm
Posts: 14174
Location: anywhere but nowhere
|
Mike=GCHQ= wrote: I'm currently thinking 24 players is all you want .......64 would be too chaotic........so i'm happy with the ps3 version as it means it wont be a case of getting pissed off for dieing every second or having your favourite vehicle nicked. if maps are as big as bf2 ...64 is great _________________   Went to a zoo, they only had one animal there, a dog............. It was a shitzu.... I’z leakin… bring amberlamps
|
|
  |
|
 |
|
Lur =GCHQ=
|
Post subject: Re: battlefield 3 news... Posted: Thu Feb 10, 2011 5:53 pm |
|
|
| Forever Alone |
 |
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 6:21 pm
Posts: 1804
Location: Raiding the cupboard
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Tjolbi=GCHQ=
|
Post subject: Re: battlefield 3 news... Posted: Thu Feb 10, 2011 6:32 pm |
|
|
| Ostracised! |
 |
Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2005 3:41 pm
Posts: 9042
Location: cooking nades in the backyard
|
remember though, battlefield 2 had stingers with lock on  you won't even need to shoot tracers first 
_________________
The banhammer thirsts for tards | There is no 'overkill'. There is only 'open fire' and 'I need to reload'.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
happyslappy
|
Post subject: Re: battlefield 3 news... Posted: Thu Feb 10, 2011 8:57 pm |
|
|
| that was a stupid comment btw |
 |
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2004 12:40 pm
Posts: 109345
Location: manchester
|
Quote: so i'm happy with the ps3 version we are happy for you  _________________ 
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Mike=GCHQ=
|
Post subject: Re: battlefield 3 news... Posted: Fri Feb 11, 2011 12:18 pm |
|
|
| Legal Pidgeon |
 |
Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2004 11:47 am
Posts: 7844
Location: Manchester
|
|
goes without saying that bf3 will be buggy as feck on release! it might mean less superior graphics but at least it saves a mess around with drivers etc
_________________ ---------------------------------------- 
|
|
| |
|
|
|
LeBeourfCurtaine
|
Post subject: Re: battlefield 3 news... Posted: Tue Feb 15, 2011 12:17 am |
|
|
| Decidedly uninterested |
 |
Joined: Thu Mar 18, 2004 11:10 pm
Posts: 10184
Location: I watch you while you sleep
|
' 42 with better textures, it's all I ask  _________________  The Pancreas of S.T.F.U. | Never take life too seriously - nobody gets out alive anyway. Disco_jim: um..... I have no excuse. | Chips: Thank the Beef | Rev Dr: Beef, I think i wee'd a little
|
|
| |
|
|
|
[QBS]Dr.Strangelove
|
Post subject: Re: battlefield 3 news... Posted: Tue Feb 15, 2011 9:00 pm |
|
|
| Bow down to the master |
 |
Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2004 11:22 pm
Posts: 2414
Location: satnav offline
|
|
Have they removed that crouch feature?
_________________
m
mmmmYou sir, are a swaggering addlepated jackanapes!
m
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Alex Quim=GCHQ=
|
Post subject: Re: battlefield 3 news... Posted: Tue Feb 15, 2011 10:30 pm |
|
|
| roadkill & antique sherrif's badge |
Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2004 11:57 pm
Posts: 1065
Location: Alone on the battlefield
|
LeBeourfCurtaine wrote: ' 42 with better textures, it's all I ask With a bit of CTF chucked in for good measure  _________________  VIVITE FUGIO
|
|
| |
|
|
|
happyslappy
|
Post subject: Re: battlefield 3 news... Posted: Thu Oct 03, 2013 4:30 pm |
|
|
| that was a stupid comment btw |
|
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2004 12:40 pm
Posts: 109345
Location: manchester
|
|
arrrr in the days when geoff was keen, the sence of purpose took years of you mate ( there is a lot to take from )
I was hoping the same for you and bf4
_________________
|
|
| |
|
|
|
