They made 5 game modes but skipped CTF.
| Gamecommunity =GCHQ= http://forum.gamecommunity.co.uk:8080/ | |
| bf3 battleblog out today, worth a look http://forum.gamecommunity.co.uk:8080/viewtopic.php?f=188&t=56599 |
Page 1 of 2 |
| Author: | nicey=GCHQ= [ Thu Sep 15, 2011 5:57 pm ] |
| Post subject: | bf3 battleblog out today, worth a look |
http://blogs.battlefield.ea.com/battlef ... ained.aspx |
|
| Author: | flatline=GCHQ= [ Thu Sep 15, 2011 6:34 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: bf3 battleblog out today, worth a look |
infantry only mofo's! |
|
| Author: | And [ Thu Sep 15, 2011 7:17 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: bf3 battleblog out today, worth a look |
They made 5 game modes but skipped CTF.
|
|
| Author: | SO19Firearms=GCHQ= [ Thu Sep 15, 2011 10:11 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: bf3 battleblog out today, worth a look |
And wrote: They made 5 game modes but skipped CTF. Always do....but they've acknowledged it this time at least...... |
|
| Author: | Caspius=GCHQ= [ Fri Sep 16, 2011 9:47 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: bf3 battleblog out today, worth a look |
SO19Firearms=GCHQ= wrote: And wrote: They made 5 game modes but skipped CTF. Always do....but they've acknowledged it this time at least...... CTF is way to structured a game mode for the majority of players that's the problem. |
|
| Author: | [QBS]Dr.Strangelove [ Sat Sep 17, 2011 2:19 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: bf3 battleblog out today, worth a look |
team sorted 
|
|
| Author: | CoolMan=GCHQ= [ Sun Sep 18, 2011 1:20 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: bf3 battleblog out today, worth a look |
so 64 players is only available as conquest? pity so we may need 2 servers? 1 64 player hardcore conquest and then a 24/32 player squad? i can supply the 64 player one and i think someone else has lined up the second? |
|
| Author: | nicey=GCHQ= [ Sun Sep 18, 2011 3:07 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: bf3 battleblog out today, worth a look |
CoolMan=GCHQ= wrote: so 64 players is only available as conquest? pity so we may need 2 servers? 1 64 player hardcore conquest and then a 24/32 player squad? i can supply the 64 player one and i think someone else has lined up the second? could be over kill for the amount of 'actual active' members who play games now....... but anyway...me and rick said we'd throw some money in..and maybe a cpl of others...so maybe in the first instance..lets rent for 3 months which is the minimum period anyway... and see how it goes on from there.... |
|
| Author: | CoolMan=GCHQ= [ Sun Sep 18, 2011 7:00 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: bf3 battleblog out today, worth a look |
so 1 64 player server which we can run at lower player count if needed |
|
| Author: | And [ Sun Sep 18, 2011 11:40 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: bf3 battleblog out today, worth a look |
I think its a bad idea to have 2 servers. 1) We will split up people. Some will go on one server and other to 2nd server. So we will struggle with 2 half full servers instead of one full. 2) Plus it's a lot of extra money |
|
| Author: | SO19Firearms=GCHQ= [ Mon Sep 19, 2011 8:24 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: bf3 battleblog out today, worth a look |
CoolMan=GCHQ= wrote: so 1 64 player server which we can run at lower player count if needed  Are there rules on servers etc? Can they be unranked on thursdays and locked for fun nights? |
|
| Author: | nicey=GCHQ= [ Mon Sep 19, 2011 9:57 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: bf3 battleblog out today, worth a look |
SO19Firearms=GCHQ= wrote: CoolMan=GCHQ= wrote: so 1 64 player server which we can run at lower player count if needed Are there rules on servers etc? Can they be unranked on thursdays and locked for fun nights? so long as you keep within the terms of ea ranked servers...you can change size/mode ect... what you cant do is alter heath regen restrict guns ect.... you do that..it becomes unranked if trev has ordered the server from i3d.... u get...or did get a free 16 player clan server..(unranked...that you can use for any prupose.... matches...or private games....but i dont think u can use them as a public open server. |
|
| Author: | Ezer =GCHQ= [ Mon Sep 19, 2011 11:21 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: bf3 battleblog out today, worth a look |
nicey=GCHQ= wrote: but anyway...me and rick said we'd throw some money in..and maybe a cpl of others...so maybe in the first instance..lets rent for 3 months which is the minimum period anyway... and see how it goes on from there.... Do we have a way of throwing money in the server rental pot? Paypal or anything like that? |
|
| Author: | nicey=GCHQ= [ Mon Sep 19, 2011 1:15 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: bf3 battleblog out today, worth a look |
Ezer =GCHQ= wrote: nicey=GCHQ= wrote: but anyway...me and rick said we'd throw some money in..and maybe a cpl of others...so maybe in the first instance..lets rent for 3 months which is the minimum period anyway... and see how it goes on from there.... Do we have a way of throwing money in the server rental pot? Paypal or anything like that? nothing set up as far as i know... seems like we got a 64 server coming..if we did want another...rackage can get a 32 player server for about 82 quid. for 3 months.... with a 16 player clan (unranked..slot server thrown in...) thing is...conquest = 64 player max... rush is 32 player max..... not much point in paying for a 64 slot server..if you want to play rush... |
|
| Author: | nicey=GCHQ= [ Mon Sep 19, 2011 6:39 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: bf3 battleblog out today, worth a look |
SO19Firearms=GCHQ= wrote: CoolMan=GCHQ= wrote: so 1 64 player server which we can run at lower player count if needed Are there rules on servers etc? Can they be unranked on thursdays and locked for fun nights? more info for u nige... http://forums.electronicarts.co.uk/batt ... rvers.html |
|
| Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ | |