Gamecommunity =GCHQ= http://forum.gamecommunity.co.uk:8080/ | |
PC ordered! awaiting delivery! :D http://forum.gamecommunity.co.uk:8080/viewtopic.php?f=83&t=43458 |
Page 1 of 2 |
Author: | Skrunk =GCHQ= [ Thu Jul 05, 2007 8:57 pm ] |
Post subject: | PC ordered! awaiting delivery! :D |
Wanna get it from a shop, experiences of DIY builds not good http://www.pcworld.co.uk/martprd/store/ ... tabIndex=1 is that good value for money???? like will i be able to upgrade easily in the future?? |
Author: | Extolerance=GCHQ= [ Thu Jul 05, 2007 10:14 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Go to Ebuyer and Overclockers etc, the have much better systems at good prices. |
Author: | Skrunk =GCHQ= [ Fri Jul 06, 2007 12:35 am ] |
Post subject: | |
ty found what i was looking for i think.......... what you peeps reckon??? http://www.overclockers.co.uk/showprodu ... 81&subcat= |
Author: | Colt Seavers [ Fri Jul 06, 2007 1:34 am ] |
Post subject: | |
looks good. prefer intel cpu myself: http://www.overclockers.co.uk/showprodu ... 81&subcat= |
Author: | Skrunk =GCHQ= [ Fri Jul 06, 2007 11:00 am ] |
Post subject: | |
hmmmm yeah intel is more propular....... found this site called http://www.pcoption.co.uk where i can get a better spec machine (not OC'd) with monitor, kboard and mouse for around the same price, why would this site be so much cheaper??? |
Author: | Skrunk =GCHQ= [ Fri Jul 06, 2007 11:10 am ] |
Post subject: | |
right the to upgrade to a dual core 2.6 ghz processor would be 173 squid, to get a 2.4 it would 73 quid. is it worth the extra money????? i could get a G15 and G5 with that kinda spare cash |
Author: | Caspius=GCHQ= [ Fri Jul 06, 2007 11:21 am ] |
Post subject: | |
=DLI= Skrunk wrote: hmmmm yeah intel is more propular.......
If it wasn't for AMD, intel prices would be twice as much and I bet we would be two years further back... |
Author: | Tao [ Fri Jul 06, 2007 12:26 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
=DLI= Skrunk wrote: right the to upgrade to a dual core 2.6 ghz processor would be 173 squid, to get a 2.4 it would 73 quid. is it worth the extra money?????
i could get a G15 and G5 with that kinda spare cash Wouldnt have thought the difference is great enough performance wise between the 2 to justify the extra 100quid. |
Author: | Skrunk =GCHQ= [ Fri Jul 06, 2007 1:13 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
kk thanks for all the advice.... so this looks like the machine im gettin 2.4Ghz Intel Dual Core pro duo 4gb Corsair RAM Nvidia 8800 GTX 768Mb 19" Haans Monitor 320GB Sata HD Vista Premium Logitech G15 Logitech G5 or Razer Copperhead plenty of skrunkage to come on that beast |
Author: | Colt Seavers [ Fri Jul 06, 2007 1:18 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
if you can, have a play with the g5 and copperhead. i have both (well, wifey has the copperhead) and both have their merits.....so it will boil down to which one feels best in your hand |
Author: | Vendetta [ Fri Jul 06, 2007 1:20 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
=DLI= Skrunk wrote: plenty of skrunkage to come on that beast
That sounds so wrong! Anyway, sweet sounding machine |
Author: | [QBS]Dr.Strangelove [ Fri Jul 06, 2007 5:21 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
do you really need 4Gb of ram? have read somewhare that its actually pointless 3Gb is fine i believe it was colt that had mentioned this before, could be wrong ps cracking system there mate |
Author: | Skrunk =GCHQ= [ Fri Jul 06, 2007 7:07 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Strangelove my man Ty so much was hoping i didnt need to spend the extra 50 on it ty ty |
Author: | Tjolbi=GCHQ= [ Fri Jul 06, 2007 7:37 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
[QBS]Dr.Strangelove wrote: do you really need 4Gb of ram?
have read somewhare that its actually pointless 3Gb is fine i believe it was colt that had mentioned this before, could be wrong ps cracking system there mate think it has more use in vista (or if you're using 64 bit) |
Author: | [QBS]Dr.Strangelove [ Fri Jul 06, 2007 8:50 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
here's that article i was mumbling on about http://technology.guardian.co.uk/online ... 18,00.html do you really need 3Gb? |
Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |